Microsoft Purview Data Governance Practice Test
Microsoft Purview Data Governance के लिए अपना आत्मविश्वास बढ़ाएँ। अवधारणाओं का अभ्यास करें, उत्तरों को समझें और हर सवाल के साथ अपना ज्ञान मज़बूत करें।
एक नमूना सवाल आज़माएँपरीक्षा का परिचय और विवरण
Microsoft Purview डेटा गवर्नेंस एसोसिएट प्रमाणन जो Purview खातों, डेटा कैटलॉग, वर्गीकरण, संवेदनशीलता लेबल, डेटा वंश, व्यावसायिक शब्दकोश, पहुँच नीतियों और Purview Insights रिपोर्टों को कवर करता है।
नमूना प्रश्न
अभ्यास कैसे काम करता है, यह जानने के लिए एक उत्तर चुनें और व्याख्या देखें।
Contoso Retail is expanding Microsoft Purview data governance for loyalty, store, and ecommerce analytics. The central data office wants a federated operating model where Finance and Marketing govern their own data but the central office keeps common standards, health reporting, and role patterns. The security reviewer is challenging an assumption made by the previous implementation team. Which design fits the requirement?
Contoso Retail is expanding Microsoft Purview data governance for loyalty, store, and ecommerce analytics. The central data office has millions of files in a storage account and needs a fast first inventory of names, fully qualified names, sizes, and modified timestamps, not schema-level classification yet. The security reviewer is challenging an assumption made by the previous implementation team. Which scan option best fits?
Contoso Retail is expanding Microsoft Purview data governance for loyalty, store, and ecommerce analytics. The central data office blocks public network access and uses classic account and portal private endpoints, then asks how to keep scans and portal access working after the new experience is enabled. The steering group wants the least-privilege answer that still supports enterprise-scale operations. Which network plan is correct?
Contoso Retail is expanding Microsoft Purview data governance for loyalty, store, and ecommerce analytics. The central data office needs to delete quality history before removing a table from a data product and wants to avoid leaving orphaned governance artifacts. A pilot failed because users could see some metadata but could not complete the intended governance task. What is the safest action?
Contoso Retail is expanding Microsoft Purview data governance for loyalty, store, and ecommerce analytics. The central data office has Azure Data Factory pipelines but lineage is missing for one factory after scans succeed against the underlying storage and SQL assets. A pilot failed because users could see some metadata but could not complete the intended governance task. Where should the team investigate?